ETF Guide line
Follow us 24/7/365
twitter
rss
Line
# 1 FREE Exchange Traded
Funds Newsletter
Join the ETF Revolution! Keep up
With The Latest News & Trends
Line
Advanced Search
Welcome, Please Log In
 
ETF Home News & Commentary ETF Directory How To Profit With ETFs Our ETF Portfolios
ETF Education ETF Ticker Symbol Guide ETF Bookstore FAQs About Us
Subscribe Bookmark and Share
Back 
17.9 Percent Real Unemployment - How Solid is the Recovery?
17.9 Percent Real Unemployment - How Solid is the Recovery?
By, Simon Maierhofer
Mar 05, 2010
The unemployment picture painted by today’s jobs report headlines is much rosier than reality. Still, they were enough to provide a serious pop for stocks. What are the real numbers and will reality seriously ding the market?
 

How do fish get caught? They open their mouth. How do investors get ensnared or misled? They believe in non-existent phenomenon like a “jobless recovery.”

Surprising as it is, for nearly a year, investors have shrugged off mounting jobless claims and rising unemployment as an ingredient that is not really required for an economic recovery.

Following today’s announcement, the major indexes like the Dow Jones (DJI: ^DJI), S&P 500 (SNP: ^GSPC), and Nasdaq (Nasdaq: ^IXIC) are all up around 1% intraday.

Does that mean that the “new bull market” is for real or is this a final gasp?

The real numbers

Today’s headline numbers report that the unemployment figure, stayed at 9.7%.

In reality, real unemployment is at 17.9%, 0.1% short of last month’s all-time high. Yes, 17.9%! This is the official number reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

The BLS publishes different sets of data on a regular basis. The main focus tends to be on the U-3 unemployment rate (currently 9.7%, seasonally adjusted).

U-3 is the “official” unemployment rate and illustrates total unemployed persons as a percentage of the civilian labor force. Another category – U-4 – includes unemployed workers plus discouraged workers. A discouraged worker is someone who’s available to work but has stopped actively seeking for work.

U-5 unemployment includes the number of unemployed workers, plus discouraged workers, plus marginally attached workers. A marginally attached worker is someone who is able and willing to work but is not actively seeking work.

U-6 is as close to the real unemployment figure as government reporting gets. This number includes unemployed workers, plus discouraged workers, plus marginally attached workers, plus workers that are forced to work part-time because they are not able to find a full-time job.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the number of U-6 unemployed workers is 17.9% (not seasonally adjusted – 16.8%, an all-time high).

Keep in mind that neither of the above categories encompasses “unemployed self-employed.” You’re handyman or contractor next door, or small business owner who can’t secure jobs are not included. Adding those to the mix would put the real unemployment number above 20%.

To make matters worse, more than five million workers will see their unemployment benefits dry up by June since Congress failed to push back the February 28 deadline to extend unemployment benefits.

No one is spared

Unfortunately, job cuts have affected every industry sector. Job cuts in the technology sector (NYSEArca: XLK) have reached the highest level in four years.

Even WalMart, a low-price leader and more depression proof outfit, continues to cut jobs and recorded its first quarterly loss ever. This trend has spilled over and continues in the entire consumer staples (NYSEArca: XLP) and consumer discretionary sector (NYSEArca: XLY). Ericsson and Pfizer are just a few companies eliminating employees at a record pace.

According to a report by global outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, U.S. employers began the year 2010 by announcing 71,482 planned job cuts, the highest tally in five months. The report, however, said that the increase in layoffs should not be seen as a sign of “recession relapse.”

Recession relapse?

How do you define a recession relapse? How do you even figure a recession is over?

There has been a huge disconnect between what’s happening on Wall Street and on Main Street. Since March 2009, the stock market (NYSEArca: TMW) has been steadily rising, as has unemployment. You’d expect stock prices to go up and unemployment claims to go down, but that hasn’t been the case.

When putting the pieces together, it helps to understand why stocks have been able to stage a relentless ten-month rally.

From October 2007 to March 2009, the Dow Jones (NYSEArca: DIA), S&P 500 (NYSEArca: SDY) and secondary indexes like the MidCap SPDRs (NYSEArca: MDY) and small caps (NYSEArca: IWM) have lost more than half of their value. Financials (NYSEArca: XLF) lost over three quarters of the market capitalization.

In March, investor pessimism had reached an extreme of historic proportions. In fact, on March 9th, the Wall Street Journal made a case for Dow 5,000 and Goldman Sachs slashed earnings growth by over 37%.

Exactly at that time, the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter send out a Trend Change Alert (on March 2, 2009) predicting the biggest rally since the October 2007 all-time highs with a upper target range of Dow 10,000. For 18 months (10-2007 – 3-2009) investors had resisted their urge to buy. This was about to change.

I want what I want

It was this pent-up urge to buy that sent stocks higher. No bad news could prevent the market from rising. Investors simply wanted to own stocks again and recapture some of their hefty losses.

Just as extreme pessimism marked the bottom of the down-turn, the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter predicted that extreme optimism would make a top. In fact, the late stages of this rally could be identified by a “the worst is over” sentiment.

No progress but much change

Throughout the fourth quarter of 2009 stocks moved higher. Even though the major indexes gained only a few percentage points from October – January, the resilience against any bad news had transformed a record number of investors into long-term bulls.

By early January, investor optimism had reached extremes not seen since 1987, 2000 and 2007 (depending on the data used). For the first time investors had more money invested in stocks than at the height of the technology boom in early 2000.

For contrarian investors, this was a huge red flag. On January 15, 2010, the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter’s Market Meter stated the following: “Dow 10,710 and S&P 1,148 might very well mark the high water mark for 2010. A major trend reversal at current prices would be consistent with all our indicators.”

The market staged one more minor high two trading days later and erased nearly three months worth of gains within weeks. Recommended ETFs like the Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3x Shares (NYSEArca: FAZ), UltraShort QQQ ProShares (NYSEArca: QID), and UltraShort Financial ProShares (NYSEArca: SKF) have gained 10%, 15% and more.

The recent rally – and today’s unemployment numbers – however, has pushed the indexes close to their January 19th high. Will more good news drive the market higher?

The one constant

On a daily basis, economic news comes and goes. Some will influence the market, others won’t. If you’ve been following news reports and corresponding stock prices, you will have noticed that the correlation between good news and higher prices or bad news and lower prices is less than obvious.

What remains constant, however, is the pattern of behavior investors have established for hundreds of years. Extremes of sentiment result in extreme reactions. This is called the herding effect and is rather predictable.

Crowd behavior of investors is largely driven by perception. The perception that stocks will continue to rise is starting to change, if it hasn’t already. Soon investors will refocus on valuations to see if a stock is worth its price tag. It was the return to due diligence that pummeled stock prices throughout 2008.

Interestingly, the 2008 declines were also preceded by extreme optimism and a feeling that stocks have nowhere to go but up.

Historically, stocks are grossly overvalued and due for another major correction. How major?
The ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter includes a detailed short, mid and long-term forecast along with a target-range for the ultimate market bottom based on historically indisputable evidence. 

 
Subscribe Bookmark and Share
 Rating
2.4 (20)
 
 Comments
Jeffery said on March 19, 2010
  Good comments going on. I like simon's view in this article.
Why aren't you posting new articles? I am addicted of reading your articles everyday. I have not seen in yahoo or on your website. I am concerned.
 
Nick said on March 17, 2010
  Manipulated market can not be predicted technically (if you believe in any form of conspiracy). Forget double tops, head and shoulders, resistances, supports or any other numerical theory. The market melt up as described by many pundits will take the market higher for a while. The question is for how long and how high. So, holding on to shorts while this melt up goes on (may last months or years) is tough. Stay on sideline or buy into this hype is the question! Big one!
 
Joe said on March 15, 2010
  So we will have DOW 0 by the end of the year. We are going to be just like Somalia. Better just pull out your money out of the stock market and shut down your businesses. America is going the way of Rome and we better prepare to starve. Hope is dead so give up.
 
Niles said on March 14, 2010
  Dear ETF Guide, you may be right on theory and analysis, but the market has been proving that your prediction was out of line since last summer. Jesse Livermore said something like the market is always right no matter how you try to make sense out of the market when you are wrong. So, you need to admit that you have been wrong since last summer regardless what the govcerenment or others were doing to manipulate the market. Timing is everything, even if the long term view is right, it doesn't mean you will not lose all your money because the short term market direction will drain off your money. In another sense, your view on cash reservation is great and sound.
 
ETFguide said on March 14, 2010
  Good questions from John and realgm. What would make the market switch direction in 2010? There are two components to the answer: 1) What is making it go up and 2) What will make it go down. Based on the comments it seems like many believe the government is manipulation the market by buying huge amounts of futures contracts. We've certainly seen that happen numerous times. There is also Trimtabs observation that $600 billion flowing into the stock market are unaccounted for. This kind of government meddling is even more effective in such a low-volume market. One would suppose that eventually normal market forces will take over. After all, the government was able to prevent the 2000 and 2007/2008 collapse. What will trigger it? There doesn't have to be one specific event. When the market is ready to fall, it will. Still, there might be an event that spooks investors and kicks off the decline. Extreme complacency, such as we've seen in January and once again now, historically calls for a decline.
 
Underground-Fan said on March 13, 2010
  (1) Alan Greenspan has publicly stated that equity valuation is critical to the USA economy, which is the tail wagging the dog; (2) Steep yield curves should indicate higher interest rates, but the Federal Reserve does the opposite; (3) pricing is the primary function of capital markets, but intervention by the Federal Reserve distorts this process; (4) USA banks have benefited from this intervention by recapitalizing at a lower cost of capital; (5) proprietary trading by USA banks also distort market pricing mechanisms; (6) credit and money supply still remain tight, and asset-backed securitization remains dormant; (7) the Federal Reserve has lost the ability to control interest rates by open market operations, because of the size of its balance sheet; (8) paying interest on reserves held at the Federal Reserve is not an efficient way to control the money supply; (9) money market funds are not what they used to be; (10) can the stock market recover as strongly or quickly if a remorseless downtrend returns?
 
Bob said on March 11, 2010
  Here is the other side of the unemployment debate that the author completely ignored: http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2010/01/08/no-the-real-unemployment-rate-isnt-17-3/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Cato-at-liberty+(Cato+at+Liberty)&utm_content=Google+Reader
(or, in case that link doesn't work: http://tinyurl.com/ygcf8bk)
 
Once Bitten said on March 10, 2010
  Your most recent newsletter stated, "We do not want to see higher prices with rising volume". While prices are only marginally higher, they *are* higher, and S&P volume appears to be on the rise as well. Timing is everything. I had to take a loss on my short ETFs and am now waiting for this market to exhibit some real sense of direction.
 
Humble Investor said on March 10, 2010
  Many have indicated that the Fed has been using printed money to buy financial assets.
I tend to agree. If so, the Fed is destroying the integrity of financial market. Good become bad; bad become good.
Bad will be rewarded; good will be punished.
How does one invest in such environment?
Very very carefully.
 
John said on March 09, 2010
  Simon,

This is a zombie market. Today the S&P retraced to 1145 before pulling back to 1140. We're now only 8 months from the 2010 elections. It's apparent to me that the Fed has the power to 'turn the dials' on this market for a period far exceeding the short-term. Yes, over the long-term the dials will seize, but right now the 'market' seems to have only one direction and that is up. Since the market rallies on bad news and good news (and we have plenty of bad news to rally on), and since both short-term AND long-term (don't know how this works) interest rates seem destined to stay down forever thus enabaling 4.50% 30 year notes (RE completely collapes with a 6.50% note), and since worldwide, federal, state and local debt is now a given and dismissed without a hiccup, what (short of terror strikes) would make it swich directions in 2010???
 
More Comments...
 Add Comment
Comment:
Your Name:
Your Email: (Email will not be displayed anywhere)
Verification Code:

Visual CAPTCHA Regenerate Code

Enter same letters and numbers you see in above image:

 
 Author Profile
Bullet Simon Maierhofer
  ETFguide
  Co-Founder
  Simon is the Co-Founder of ETFguide.com and worked as a registered investment advisor (RIA) for 8 years. Simon holds a banking degree with honors from the prestigious German Sparkasse Bank. He grew up in Bavaria/Germany.
  http://www.etfguide.com
 Other Research from Author
Flaws of the European ...

Up 10 Percent in 15 Da...

Bank's Real Earnings -...

Will Earnings Sink the...

Should You Bear Market...

Ads
©2010 ETFGuide.com All rights reserved.
For more information regarding use of this site, please review our
Sitemap, Contact Us, Resources, Advertise with Us, Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions,Webmaster
Web designed and Powered by BimSym eBusiness Solutions, Inc.