ETF Guide line
Follow us 24/7/365
twitter
rss
Line
# 1 FREE Exchange Traded
Funds Newsletter
Join the ETF Revolution! Keep up
With The Latest News & Trends
Line
Advanced Search
Welcome, Please Log In
 
ETF Home News & Commentary ETF Directory How To Profit With ETFs Our ETF Portfolios
ETF Education ETF Ticker Symbol Guide ETF Bookstore FAQs About Us
Subscribe Bookmark and Share
Back 
What or Who is Driving up Prices?
What or Who is Driving up Prices?
By, Simon Maierhofer
Mar 19, 2010
This rally has broken more records and set more historic extremes than any other rally in history. Investors haven’t had to deal with a decline of 0.25% or more, in over three weeks. What is driving this rally and how far can it go?
 

Investing is about putting the odds in your favor. There are no absolute certainties, but there are high probabilities.

Recently, the probabilities have been skewed by extremes that haven’t been seen in years, even decades.

Up until today for example, the S&P 500 (NYSEArca: SPY) hasn’t had a correction of more than 0.25% for 17 consecutive days. Last Friday, the Nasdaq closed up for the 13th straight session, something that hasn’t happened in nearly 20 years.

In January, the percentage of bearish investors had reached a record-low level not seen in nearly two decades.  This extreme investor optimism caused the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter to state the following on January 16:

“Bullish sentiment has reached a level where it is suffocating nearly all bearish currents and undertones. The natural reaction would be to conform to the trend and turn bullish. We believe that every day that brings higher prices presents a better opportunity for the bears.”

This opportunity came in just a few days when the major indexes a la Dow Jones (DJI: ^DJI), S&P 500 (SNP: ^GSPC) and Nasdaq (Nasdaq: ^IXIC) started to decline about 8%.

The winning streak, as of recent, however, has pushed the major indexes to new recovery highs. Those recovery highs coincide with a number of oddities that are hard to explain, even concerning. What are they?

Lack of conviction

Many have proclaimed the beginning of a new bull market, especially with the break through the S&P 1,150 resistance. Shouldn’t such a milestone push happen on high volume?

Average volume for the month of March has been 1.02 billion shares. The average volume from March 1 to March 18 over the preceding five years has been 1.76 billion shares. Not a single March 1 – 18 average has been below 1.7 billion shares.

Investor sentiment discrepancies

As mentioned earlier, investor sentiment reached bullish extremes in January 2009. Even though prices are higher today than at the January 19 highs, investor bullishness has cooled off significantly. In fact, the percentage of bullish retail investors dropped 9.9% last week despite steadily rising prices.

The Volatility Index (Chicago Options: ^VIX), a measure of fear and complacency (low readings generally foreshadow market declines), has fallen from the January 2010 low, to the lowest level since May 15, 2008. This is precisely when the post-2007 market meltdown started.

From May to November 2008, even the best and biggest blue chips stock ETFs such as the Vanguard Large Cap ETF (NYSEArca: VV) and iShares S&P 100 Index (NYSEArca: OEF) lost 40%.

Mid cap stocks (NYSEArca: MDY), small cap stocks (NYSEArca: IYR), individual sectors such as financials (NYSEArca: XLF), consumer discretionary (NYSEArca: XLY), and materials (NYSEArca: XLB) fared much worse.

This time around, however, the sentiment extremes and VIX resulted in a minor market top that didn’t even last two months. What is different?

A different kind of bailout

The chart below illustrates the government’s bailout track record; clearly not impressive. It seems like Washington D.C. has found a different kind of bailout. Ronald Reagan established the platform for this different bailout in 1988.

                              

On March 18, 1988, Ronald Reagan signed Executive Order 12631. Below is an excerpt from Executive Order 12631 - Working Group on Financial Markets - Mar. 19, 1988; 53 FR 9421, 3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 559:

"By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America, and in order to establish a Working Group on Financial Markets, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Establishment. (a) There is hereby established a Working Group on Financial Markets (Working Group). The Working Group shall be composed of:

1) the Secretary of the Treasury, or his designee;
2) the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or his designee;
3) the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or his designee; and
4) the Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or her designee.

Section 2. Purposes and Functions. (a) Recognizing the goals of enhancing the integrity, efficiency, orderliness, and competitiveness of our Nation's financial markets and maintaining investor confidence.

This quartet has become known as the Plunge Protection Team (PPT).

What’s the PPT’s job?

The Plunge Protection Team's job description is to prevent another 1987-like "Black Monday" from occurring (the Dow fell 22.61% on 10-19-1987). How can that be done?

According to John Crudele of the New York Post, Robert Heller, a former member of the Federal Reserve Board, described the modus operandi of the PPT as "buying market averages in the futures market, thus stabilizing the market as a whole."

The existence of the PPT was verified by former-Clinton advisor George Stephanopoulos via an appearance on Good Morning America on September 17, 2000. At the time of Mr. Stephanopoulos' appearance, the Nasdaq (Nasdaq: QQQQ) was caught up in the dot.com bubble bust and had fallen 25% in less than six months, as did the Technology Select Sector SPDRs (NYSEArca: XLK).

What caused the 70% rally

TrimTabs founder and CEO Charles Biderman, added further evidence to suspicions many have had for a while. TrimTabs is a research firm that tracks money flows into the market.

Here's what Mr. Biderman had to say: "We cannot identify the source of the money that pushed stock prices up so far so fast." More specifically, the source of about $600 billion net new cash necessary to lift the market's overall capitalization by $6 trillion last year could not be identified."

Biderman continues, "We know that the U.S. government has spent hundreds of billions of dollars to support the auto industry, the housing market and the banks and brokers. Why not support the stock market as well? The money did not come from traditional players.

One way to manipulate the stock market would be for the Fed or the Treasury to buy a nominal $60 to $70 billion of S&P 500 stock futures each month for as long as necessary. Depending on margin levels, as little as $5 billion to $15 billion per month was all that was necessary to lift the S&P 500 by 67% (statement was made on January 6, 2010)."

Obviously the Plunge Protection Team was the culprit behind this entire rally. The ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter predicted the onset of this rally previously on March 2nd based on a composite of common sense indicators.

How long can the market exhale without inhaling?

It is, however, possible that this rally lasted beyond its normal expiration date with some friendly help from Washington. What’s next?

Nobody knows for sure. But when the present throws you a curve ball, it is often helpful to look at the past for guidance.

The April issue of the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter compares the current constellation (which could well be a double top) with the double tops of 2000 and 2007. It also takes a look at Japan and many parallels between the Nikkei’s 80% meltdown and the U.S. market’s performance. The conclusions are enlightening and might protect investors from yet another historic streak – a losing streak.

The Plunge Protection Team wasn’t able to prevent the 2000 and 2008 meltdown, how long will it be able to keep this market afloat? 

 
Subscribe Bookmark and Share
 Rating
2.33 (9)
 
 Comments
diamond head said on March 26, 2010
  One thought to ponder... what if the Fed has turned into a for profit entity. If they obviously can go long they can easily go short.
 
Danny Riley said on March 25, 2010
  DBOY- I read the article and it has a lot of merits. I have been in the S&P for the last 25 years. Was there for the 87 CRASH and the 1990 decline and the 1999-200 TECH bubble. While the price action currently is very similar to what happened in 87 the lack of any down day and the size of the down days is astonishing. I did all the UBS program business for 10 years and right now getting the S&P into sell program program levels only happens in very short blasts and then right back into buy program levels, some times we go from a buy into a sell than right back into a buy. I have never seen that type of price action ever. Also the lower volumes make it very easy to move around. Cheap money and no sellers have made it easy for the PPT lately. The other part is is program trading makes up 60-70% of the volume whats level? 1183, 1201 on tap in the spoos...
 
BUfer said on March 25, 2010
  Another way to say it is that liquidity is being used to allow banks to recapitalize (issue new equity and debt) at a lower cost of capital (higher share prices, lower bond spreads), not to mention trading profts (juiced by leverage) and underwriting fees. But is the system as liquid as people think (refer to comments about money market funds)? Two other points to ponder: (1) WSJ has reported that debt as bond securitization now exceeds debt as loan issuance, where the former has a higher cost of capital than the latter, (2) capital gains tax rates will increase after this year; at some point this year those who have gone long after last year's bottom will have a chance to cash out at the lowest possible rate before it expires on Dec 31, 2010.
 
ETFguide said on March 24, 2010
  sterman7, the volume data is based on shares traded on the NYSE. Some of the places you can get that data from are online brokers like Thinkorswim, on the NYSE website or on the WSJ's website, which also lists volume on the Nasdaq and AMEX - http://online.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/marketsdata.html?mod=hps_us_indexes
 
sterman7 said on March 24, 2010
  In the post you mention volume
"Average volume for the month of March has been 1.02 billion shares. The average volume from March 1 to March 18 over the preceding five years has been 1.76 billion shares. Not a single March 1 – 18 average has been below 1.7 billion shares." What exchange, index or ETF are you referencing? Thanks for the great analysis.
 
Leland said on March 24, 2010
  In reading what was written about Executive Order 12631 (the PPT), in private industry any such "working group" with similar objectives would be charged with collusion and price fixing and a host of other illegal monopolistic practices. Too bad that, if the government sanctions it, it is considered legal.
 
plowboy said on March 24, 2010
  If I understand rightly the info here, it says the government is spending billions per month (of borrowed money) to prop up the stock market (so the big crooks can at least get their money back and/or make a profit before there might be a crash). Is this about it? Oh, my grandkids will be paying down the debt all their lives, while the rich crooks live in luxury.
 
Ed Morgan said on March 24, 2010
  You should have mentioned the very odd and highly secretive gold swaps with foreign central banks. Also, the incredible short positions in precious metals held by 4 of our large investment banks, primarily JP Morgan. No wonder the Fed refuses to allow itself to be audited by anyone. This may not end well.
 
BUfer said on March 23, 2010
  As a matter of disclosure: my observations were based on cursory reviews of information available to anyone by Internet from popular mutual fund companies. These observations are limited by: (1) compositions are valid only for the dates of disclosure (and thus exposed to window-dressing), and (2) dates of disclosure are not timely. In any case: the contrast is startling, and says more about the system pre-Lehman than post-Lehman. (As they say: past performance does not guarantee future performance.) Readers are also invited to read the following:

ETF Guide: Can the U.S. Government Prevent another Meltdown? (February 02, 2010)

Bloomberg: Goldman Sachs Wimps Out in Buck-Breaking Brawl: David Reilly (February 03, 2010)
 
ETFguide said on March 23, 2010
  BUfer, thank you for sharing your keen observations. You raise excellent questions, which unfortunately we don't know the answer to. If you find out more information that sheds light on the issue of money market funds, please share it with us.
 
More Comments...
 Add Comment
Comment:
Your Name:
Your Email: (Email will not be displayed anywhere)
Verification Code:

Visual CAPTCHA Regenerate Code

Enter same letters and numbers you see in above image:

 
 Author Profile
Bullet Simon Maierhofer
  ETFguide
  Co-Founder
  Simon is the Co-Founder of ETFguide.com and worked as a registered investment advisor (RIA) for 8 years. Simon holds a banking degree with honors from the prestigious German Sparkasse Bank. He grew up in Bavaria/Germany.
  http://www.etfguide.com
 Other Research from Author
Flaws of the European ...

Up 10 Percent in 15 Da...

Bank's Real Earnings -...

Will Earnings Sink the...

Should You Bear Market...

Ads
©2010 ETFGuide.com All rights reserved.
For more information regarding use of this site, please review our
Sitemap, Contact Us, Resources, Advertise with Us, Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions,Webmaster
Web designed and Powered by BimSym eBusiness Solutions, Inc.