ETF Guide
Line
# 1 FREE Exchange Traded
Funds Newsletter
Join the ETF Revolution! Keep up
With The Latest News & Trends
Line
Advanced Search
Welcome, Please Log In
 
twitter   rss  
Subscribe Bookmark and Share
Back 
Oddities that could Topple the Market
Oddities that could Topple the Market
By, Simon Maierhofer
Mar 23, 2010
There are two types of investors. One takes any gain they can get, no matter what – this strategy works only in a bull market. The other looks behind the scenes trying to figure out what’s next. If you think the market’s performance has been unusual, you might be onto something.
 

The Webster’s dictionary defines odd as not regular, expected or planned, differing markedly from the usual or ordinary.

Understandably, few people enjoy being the odd ball out. As a parent, if your child acts odd or shows unusual behavior, you likely become concerned. What if, as an investor or trader, the market displays odd behavior? Is there reason to be concerned?

As of late, the market has been acting odd, or different from the usual or ordinary. How so?

Let’s take trading volume as an example. Trading volume is important because it, in general, reflects the breadth and conviction behind the market’s moves. Historically, bull markets or developing bull markets have seen heavy buying on up days and light selling on down days.

Light selling amidst broad buying is part of a healthy process. Just as humans inhale and exhale, the market moves up and down within the general trend. A healthy person doesn’t labor or cough when breathing, just as a healthy market doesn’t labor upward on low volume, or move down on strong volume.
 
Oddity #1: Volume

Based on this analogy, the market must be suffering from some sort of cough or pneumonia. The average NYSE trading volume for the first 14 days of March was 1.02 billion shares. During that period of time, the Nasdaq (Nasdaq: QQQQ) rose 13 consecutive times.

This is the biggest winning streak in nearly 20 years and it came on low volume. The average volume for the first 14 trading days from 2005 – 2009 was 1.76 billion shares, 42% above this month’s average volume.

Last Friday, March 19, was the 15th trading day of March and happened to be a Quadruple Witching day. Quadruple Witching is when stock index futures, stock index options, stock futures and stock options expire. This usually results in more volatile activity.

In fact, volume nearly doubled on Friday to 1,97 billion shares. Incidentally, Friday was also the first day the S&P recorded a loss of more than 0.25% since late February. Even though advance/decline numbers were the worst since late January, nearly half of Friday’s volume occurred in the last two hours, which saw the indexes recover some of their losses.

To add another twist, volume on the previous Quadruple Witching day (in December 2009), was well over 3 billion traded shares, which makes Friday look insignificant. In the final tally, volume as an indicator, even though conflicting and at odds with itself, paints a predominant bearish picture.

Oddity #2: Sentiment and the VIX

There are multiple ways to measure investor sentiment. Investor’s Intelligence (II) polls investment advisors and newsletter writers, the America Association of individual Investors (AAII) polls retail investors, the National Association of Active Investment Managers (NAAIM) polls fund managers, and the Volatility Index (Chicago Options: ^VIX) measures the fear of option traders.

Contrarian investors use any or all of the above as indicators of crowd behavior. When one of them or, in particular, all of them reaches extremes, it is usually a sign that enough have jumped on the bandwagon, which usually occurs before a trend reversal.

To illustrate: In January 2009, investor sentiment had reached a bullish reading that was extreme for that particular point in time. The ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter issued a sell signal above Dow (NYSEArca: DIA) 9,000. After hovering above that mark for a few days, the Dow Jones (DJI: ^DJI), S&P 500 (SNP: ^GSPC) and Nasdaq (Nasdaq: ^IXIC) dropped nearly 30% in two months.

This 30% drop, following the 2008 meltdown resulted in the most extreme bearish reading in decades. According to the above-mentioned polls, less than one in five investors was bullish, while the bearish camp was overcrowded. According to Wall Street, Great Depression 2.0 was just around the corner.

On March 2nd, however, the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter issued a buy alert and recommend buying long and leveraged long ETFs such as the Ultra Financial ProShares (NYSEArca: UYG), Ultra S&P 500 ProShares (NYSEArca: SSO), Financial Select Sector SPDRs (NYSEArca: XLF) and many others.

Investors, however, are quick to forgive and forget. Banks (NYSEArca: KBE) continue to be mired in risky business, stocks are up, and investors are bullish again. In January, bullish sentiment reached peaks not seen since 2007. True to form, the market corrected.

The January correction did its job and enthusiasm cooled off a bit. Interestingly, investors are less bullish today than they were two months ago, even though stocks are higher today than in January.

While the bullish sentiment is lagging, trader’s complacency is leading. Yesterday the VIX fall to new lows. 16.17 was the lowest reading since July, 2007. Do you remember what happened shortly thereafter? The market topped and dropped, as much as 54%.

The chart below illustrates the interaction between price, investors sentiment and the VIX.

                                   

Oddity #3: 2000 and 2007 all over again?

In hindsight, it seems that the January 2010 sentiment extremes were a false alarm. Additionally, the market seems to defy much of the technical tools available to us.

A look at the 2000 and 2007 major market peaks, however, shows that both times the indexes came back to retest and even overtake the prior tops within a few months. The term double top should thus be painfully familiar to us.

The fact that the stock market is creating extremes, both in terms of price, sentiment and duration, should be a warning to all who own stocks (NYSEArca: VTI) and even bonds (NYSEArca: AGG).

A volcano generally starts to bulge, release gases and create tremors before erupting. The same is true with the stock market.

The technology (NYSEArca: XLK) bubble took time to develop. The extent of the sub-prime crisis wasn’t fully understood (it probably still isn’t) until the major indexes shed 50% of their value. There are always tremors leading up to the main event.

Domestically, those tremors are low trading volume and ignorance towards declining real estate prices, rising unemployment, rising foreclosures, rising bank failures, etc.

Internationally, those tremors are seen in the default of Dubai World, bailout for Greece, ticking time bomb in Japan, and financial troubles in Spain, Portugal, Italy, Ireland, and many more.

Does that mean the market will fall apart tomorrow? Not necessarily. But historically, right now is the time to be careful and pro-active. Complacency hurt investors in 2000 and 2007. If there’s one wish many have, it is that they would have been more alert at the time everyone else wasn’t.

The above oddities all add up to cracks in the dam. Eventually the dam will rupture and give way to tremendous flooding, causing much damage and loss.
 
A few minutes of ‘out of the box’ thinking everyday can prevent a 2000 or 2007 like outcome for your portfolio. Each issue of the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter includes a short, mid and long-term outlook for the stock market and major asset classes.

The April issue takes a look at the lessons learned from prior market tops, Japan and the 2000-day moving average. Oddities or irregularities don’t have to be your enemies. When interpreted correctly, they can be your ally.

 
Subscribe Bookmark and Share
 Rating
1.84 (31)
 
 Comments
Graham P. said on April 12, 2010
  Those who can't do, gamble, those too timid to gamble, advise the gamblers. The doers are the working people who have added value to society since people first farmed, invented, wheels, plows, the steam engine, the computer and the internet, the gamblers are the investors and bankers, then there are people like the author who analyze the winning and losing of the gamblers. They are so far removed from creation that they make the obscene error of treating the stock market like a roulette wheel.
The movement of the stock market is not "like someone breathing" in in out, or any other kind of circular "pattern". It is a reflection of the steady growth in human productivity from the days 50,000 - 200 years ago when 90% of people had to farm to today when less than 10 percent of folks farm. The stock market would be less erratic with out these folks with a gamblers mentality, but even with the skewing influence of their minds corrupted by their gambling addition the market must reflect the increase in productive that technology brings at a more and more rapid pass. Yes, that progress could stop if there was some great tragedy, but I wouldn't bet on that, and no person should bet against human progress lest the short selling sick desire for failure becomes a self filling prophesy. We all know we are more productive this year than we were 5 years ago, a rational market will always reflect that, despite what those who watch hallucinated patterns instead of the reality of technologies progress.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Roger Williams said on March 25, 2010
  One thing I learnt in kindergarten (of investing school) was to never fight the tape. Just go with the flow and "follow" trends instead of trying to "predict" the next top or bottom. Result? Portfolio has more than doubled since January 2008, while the market is down 20% since then.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
D-man said on March 25, 2010
  NY

"The long term view of ETF guide is most likely right, but the odd market can last longer than the bears can survive or take a living saving breath."

Agree on "the trend can persist longer". Actually I wonder sometime whether this is not the beginning of something bigger; at the beginning of secular bulls, investors stay pessimists for years; but there is also the market action which doesn't look like sustainable (it's too violent on the upside). More, the secular bulls are supported by fundamentals (lately a technology break or high interest rates and low indebtedness - we have none of these today). So while a secular move can be under the market, the odds are not favoring it; bulls supported by liquidity are subject of sudden sell-offs.

As for the bears, if we look at various measures out there which worked in the past, there is blood among bears; there are not that many left and they have big losses today. They won't touch shorts in a while I guess. Look at Vince :)

"Today's investors are much better informed with all indicators like the sentiments, only implying that these indicators will not work as effectively as before."

It's a good point, I think about it often and its partly true; but remember, fear and greed will always be there with humans. What is also true is that we have today algorithms playing on the markets; those have no soul, hence no fear and greed. But they to are programmed by humans :)

"One reason might be that the ETF Guide's bearish view actually delays the market crash ..... as an odd consequence."

Look, the market doesn't do what ETF Guide says; we have Birinyi & associates with a target on S&P of 1700; it's possible, but I guess by that time oil (aka "the economic killer") will be at 200$. Now Birinyi had a 14000 on the Dow in 2007 because he was sure the FED will save the credit markets; well, the market didn't do what Biribyi said; he probably bought all the way down (on margin?) and had a big margin call. Now he needs S&P to go to 1700 to make it back, so his PRs are arranging interviews on Bloomberg where he repeats S&P 1700. Again it's all possible on speculation...
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Vince said on March 24, 2010
  Halam, you started your shorts way too early. I started mine on the first of the year and it's been a bloodbath with my highly leveraged short ETFs. I unloaded all of them at a large loss but quick enough before they fell off the cliff. I've learned my lesson and will probably not dabble in shorts again. I'm simply hoarding a lot of cash to buy when the market falls.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
ETFguide said on March 24, 2010
  Your observation is absolutely correct Patrick. However all indicators should be viewed in context with the overall market and other indicators. The economy was in better shape in 2003 and leading up to the 2007 top then it is today. There also wasn't a 75% one year rally. Nothing says that the VIX can't go low, but the current level flashes a red flag nevertheless.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Patrick said on March 24, 2010
  I question how much emphasis should be put on the VIX. Looking back during the cyclical bull of 2003-2007, the VIX was consistently as low as 10.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Aaron said on March 24, 2010
  If you like many are holding short ETF's at a loss and feel the market is going down and want to worry less about it going up in the short term then concider a hedge using options. If you own a short or ultra short ETF they are covered by calls and puts. Buying a put on a short ETF would hedge if the market goes up, and if the market goes down then you only lose the cost of the put--food for thought. It's not ideal, but atleast you can sleep at night.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Dogwood said on March 23, 2010
  Wow TO, we must be long lost brothers! I've been burned by this market more in the last couple of years than in the previous thirty put together. Every time I seem to take a long position, everything falls. Every time I take a short position we get on of these insane rallies. I just know if I cover the market will tank in the next few weeks. But it's getting very hard to keep taking losses day after day after day.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
manfer said on March 23, 2010
  I have read your comments since august, and everithing make sense, however you can´t fight the market and even do volume is important the prices and trends are a lot more important.In a market like this where a lot of interest are in place, at least en the short term the hand behind this is reaching it´s goal sending the market to the clouds.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Halam said on March 23, 2010
  Started to build Short ETF portfolio since September 2009. Holding all until now, think how ugly is the portfolio. I remember I read somewhere it is better 5 minute early rather 10 minute late ! It was too early to build portfolio with SHORT ETFs. This article encourages me to hold and sit tight with my current short portfolio.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
More Comments...
 Add Comment
Comment:
Your Name:
Your Email: (Email will not be displayed anywhere)
Verification Code:
 
 Author Profile
Bullet Simon Maierhofer
  ETFguide
  Co-Founder
  Simon is the Co-Founder of ETFguide.com and worked as a registered investment advisor (RIA) for 8 years. Simon holds a banking degree with honors from the prestigious German Sparkasse Bank. He grew up in Bavaria/Germany.
  http://www.etfguide.com
 Other Research from Author
January Barometer Pred...

The Fed's Dirty Little...

Will QE3 Hopium Propel...

Has The Market's Up Si...

Better Safe than Sorry...

Ads
©2012 ETFGuide.com All rights reserved.
For more information regarding use of this site, please review our
Sitemap, Contact Us, Resources, Advertise with Us, Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions,Webmaster
Web designed and Powered by BimSym eBusiness Solutions, Inc.