ETF Guide line
Follow us 24/7/365
twitter
rss
Line
# 1 FREE Exchange Traded
Funds Newsletter
Join the ETF Revolution! Keep up
With The Latest News & Trends
Line
Advanced Search
Welcome, Please Log In
 
ETF Home News & Commentary ETF Directory How To Profit With ETFs Our ETF Portfolios
ETF Education ETF Ticker Symbol Guide ETF Bookstore FAQs About Us
Subscribe Bookmark and Share
Back 
The Sobering Truth Behind Unemployment Numbers
The Sobering Truth Behind Unemployment Numbers
By, Simon Maierhofer
Apr 05, 2010
“Employers have added most jobs in 3 years” is the information conveyed by Wall Street. In reality, jobless workers have remained stagnant for three months and it will take nothing short of a miracle to get back to pre-2007 conditions. But, what does the market say?
 

The day after April Fools Day was the most anticipated day of the month. It was on this fateful April 2nd that the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) released the long-awaited unemployment numbers.

That very day, the U.S. equity markets (NYSEArca: IWV) were closed. Investors looking for an instant reaction had to look at the futures market or what stocks – developed markets (NYSEArca: EFA) and emerging markets (NYSEArca: EEM) – did abroad.

  

Even though some headlines blew the unemployment news out of proportion by exclaiming that “Employers added most jobs in 3 years,” others, such as the following, summed the picture up more realistically: “Jobs report: Not big numbers but … welcome numbers.”

For the third straight month, the seasonally adjusted U-3 unemployment numbers remained the same – 9.7%.

The Labor Department said employers added 162,000 jobs in March, the most since the recession began but below analyst’s expectations of 200,000. This number includes the 48,000 temporary workers hired for the U.S. Census.

According to estimates by ADP, a payroll company, the private sector lost 23,000 jobs in March. This estimate does not include government employees. Regardless of which numbers are correct, we have bigger fish to fry.

Bigger fish to fry

The U-3 unemployment figure of 9.7% is a palatable gauge of unemployment designed to make Wall Street happy, or so you would think. Looking at the U-3 numbers it becomes obvious that the real bull market is not in equities, but in unemployment (see chart below).

However, the real unemployment rate, even by the standards of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, is much higher. The U-6 unemployment number, as the real data is called, is at 17.5%, within 0.5% of its all-time high. This figure includes discouraged workers who’ve stopped looking, marginally attached workers, and workers that are forced to work part-time because full-time jobs are not available.

Taking off the rose-colored glasses

The post 2007 recession has eliminated 8.4 million jobs and rendered 15.7 million American’s jobless.

The mere fact that the palatable version of the unemployment rate has remained at 9.7% for three straight months, has Wall Street cheering.

Before chiming in, consider what it will take to simply get back to a normal unemployment rate of 5%. This is mindboggling.

The current labor force of 154 million will increase by about 1.8 million over each of the next five years because of “newbies” entering the job market. By 2014, the labor force will be around 163 million. A 5% U-3 (not U-6) unemployment rate would equate to 8.15 million workers without a job.

7.55 million jobs will have to be created to reduce the number of job-less workers from today’s 15.7 million to 8.15 million. To accomplish this, there would have to be 125,833 jobs created each and every month over the next five years with no jobs lost.

The average monthly job growth over the past 10 years has been about 50,000. The average monthly job growth over the past 20 years has been about 90,000. Keep in mind that the 1990 – 2010 timeframe hosted the biggest bull market and economic expansion in history. Do you see a 1990s and early 2000s bull market around you?

Explaining the unexplainable

The discrepancy between the stock market (NYSEArca: VTI) and the actual economy is as obvious as an approaching freight train.

The Dow Jones (DJI: ^DJI), S&P 500 (SNP: ^GSPC), Nasdaq (Nasdaq: ^IXIC) and virtually all other indexes have rallied while the economy has only improved marginally. What caused this massive rally from the March 2009 lows?

After a 55% drop from October 2007 to March 2009, the indexes were extremely oversold and nearly everyone involved in investing had turned bearish, according to some polls, 4 out of 5 investors were bearish and sold stocks.

For contrarian investors, this is a buy signal. In fact, the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter issued a Trend Change Alert on March 2nd and recommended to load up on long and leveraged ETFs such as the Financial Select Sector SPDRs (NYSEArca: XLF) and others.

As per this Trend Change Alert, the rally was to carry the Dow Jones (NYSEArca: DIA) as high as 10,000, and the S&P (NYSEArca: SPY) as high as 1,000. In hindsight, those target levels were too low. But at the time they were given, they were extremely optimistic and subject to laughter and mockery.

The end of this rally was to be marked by extreme optimism and a “the worst is over” attitude. Just as extreme pessimism marked the bottom of the previous downturn, extreme optimism was to mark the end of this overextended rally.

Time-proven techniques

Students of market and price behavior know that a good time to square your positions is when everyone else is rushing to buy stocks, while the best time to buy is when “blood is on Wall Street.”

While news or economic numbers may influence stock prices for a day or two, the pattern of crowd behavior has provided a time-less, reliable template for investors. If things head up, it’s time to get out.

Granted, investor sentiment is not a short-term timing tool, but it raises a red flag. Such red flags appeared on a large scale in 2000 and 2007 and on a smaller scale in April 2008 and December 2008.

Even though the red flags were a bit pre-mature they all led to declines of 30% or more. A look at the chart shows that investors who sold out too early in 2000 or too early in 2007 were glad they did just a few months later.

Similarly today, the red flags may be a bit premature and don’t necessarily mean you have to sell today, but the chances that prices are lower, perhaps significantly lower months from today, are high.

For some sectors, the period of correction may already have begun. The utilities sector (NYSEArca: XLU), materials sector (NYSEArca: XLB) and health care sector (NYSEArca: XLV) are still below their prior low. China’s economy – the supposed engine behind the new bull market – is lagging, with the Shanghai Composite still below its August high.

For right now investor perception is more powerful than reality and any kind of news, even stagnant unemployment, results in rising stock prices.

Do you remember the time – during much of 2007, 2008 and 2009 – when any kind of news resulted in falling prices? Investor’s decisions are more emotional than rational. That’s why strong trends tend to persist longer than anticipated, as is the case with this rally.

Once the trend changes, however, watch out! The ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter provides regular short, mid, and long-term forecasts along with a target level for the end of this rally and the ultimate market bottom.

If history is correct once again, the broad investing masses will be buying close to the top and selling close to the bottom. It takes an out-of-the box thinker to stay ahead of the trend. 

 
Subscribe Bookmark and Share
 Rating
2.92 (12)
 
 Comments
Shaft said on May 02, 2010
  Unemployment can be drastically cut if the major corporations were to take up some of the loss, after all they have benfited from the bailout and they have some respoinsibilities to shar their bailout money with the average citizen.
 
Hasanul said on April 08, 2010
  I will hold my short ETFs until the great bear shows his tail!
 
realgm said on April 08, 2010
  Well, I also feel that the bear may have better days in June, but it is hard to tell from now.

The key on waiting for a correction is that you just don't know how things would look like when the correction happens. I just don't see how the market can keep going up much more at this point.

If reality strike in, we may have a sell off (great for bear). If it is mainly just big traders taking profit, it may just be another "buy-on-the-dip" trap. So if you are planning to tough it out now, the exit-or-not decision should be made at the point when the correction occurs.
 
Raza said on April 08, 2010
  Folks: if u're facing unrealized losses on the short side, like I am (e.g. holding short ETFs), I suggest waiting till at least July. In my opinion, it will become increasingly difficult for companies to exceed year-over-year comparisons after Q1; Q3 results (in October) are what I am shooting for at this point, unless there's some other exogenous event that precipitates the situation (like some Eurozone stuff).
 
Nick said on April 07, 2010
  If you read too many bearish comments (news), you loose the ability to think any bullish possibility (that is how human mind works). The bullish stance may be short lived in current cycle but can cause lots of losses in your investments if you sell longs and pile on to shorts with bearish outlook. I wonder how many readers are burned by this and learned hard lesson that there are no experts only opinions in this market.
 
rob said on April 07, 2010
  while all the hot shots try to short the market i made 20% gain in 2009 on high yield corporate and muni mutual funds only 12% of my investments are in stock funds learn how to trade bond funds and take capital gains you will be a lot happier and also get paid to wait. from 1900 to 1950 bonds outperformed stocks we are entering that period again starting in year 2000
 
Hasanul said on April 06, 2010
  I learned a lot from realgm's thoughfult comments in this site. Eric - I had plenty of oppertunity to take profit but, I was greedy and trusted heavily in ETFguide's Market Meter and nice comments without applying money management rule. Yes, it is very difficult to predict the market. I will remind myself that ETFguide's proven successuful "Trend Change Alert" in past (which I missed !) does not prove the Alerts will be correct in future. Since I already got a big loss too now, I will just hold it until the next correction, which may not occur very soon.
 
realgm said on April 06, 2010
  The ETFguide has some good points, but they are only good if the US gov't does not manipulate the market as much as they currently do. Another reason why I am not sure if a crash is coming anymore is the fact that the wall street bankers own the US gov't. They can find tones of ways to dump their toxic assets on the US gov't behind the scene. They can do many things to stop people from discovering all the frauds and crimes they have done. This is how sad the US is in reality.

My expectation is that more "good" news would come out while "bad" news would either be ignore or somehow be presented as "positive" news. This would likely happen for months.

Since a lot is expected out of the upcoming earning reports, I think we will see some "disappointing" reports resulting in a 5% to 15% correction. I am still holding my short position (which is in pretty heavy loss already), and hoping to exit if there is a 10% correction over the earning reports. The reason I am still holding my short is that the market shows people are expecting a lot out of Q1, and likely be disappointed (traders taking profits to trigger a small sell off not likely a crash). It is very difficult to predict the market, but there is limited upside from this point on. I think S&P can go to 1250+ (maybe even 1300) before this rally is over. Since I already got a big loss now, I think I will just tough it out for the next correction.

However, the general trend is still bullish unless a shocking event happens (PIIGS going into trouble or even approaching bankrupcy or the US gov't wants to share the reality to the general public (not a chance with the Wall Street bankers)).
 
Dresden said on April 06, 2010
  Not following the math in Maierhofer's article. Because the labor force will increase by 1.8 million each year organically with "newbies" entering the market, 150k jobs would need to be created each month just to keep current unemployment numbers even. To reduce unemployment to 5%, an additional 125k jobs would need to be created on top of the 150k to stay even. Maierhofer leaves out the 150k when making his estimate of monthly job growth needed to fall back to 5%.
 
realgm said on April 06, 2010
  The market doesn't look good for the bear. Q1 results would likely be good and "better than expected". Even if there are certain bad results, it wouldn't create panic because people in general expected the US gov't to keep the printing press going. No panic = no sell off. This kind of mentally keep the US market going up like crazy, commodities prices are also going up. USD is apparently staying strong, but that's mainly because Euro is in even worse shape. If you check USD vs healthier economies like Canada and Australia, USD is going down the drain. People expecting that as long as the US gov't won't pull its support, the market would not change direction. Given the low inflation number, the US gov't has no incentive to cut the money supply because they know the economy is still in bad shape. I think the low inflation number is mainly because the economy is so bad that it has deflation and the money printing neutralized it with inflation, hence low inflation figure. The inflation was there because of those commodities that went up in price based on hype: e.g. Oil, Gold, etc.

The US debt is growing bigger and bigger, but the gov't would still try to convince people that the size of debt is manageable and the US needs to have more debts in order to print its way out of this recession.

A key thing to see is if the treasury auction is good. If it is, it means there are still a lot of people believing in the US gov't ability to repay its debt. If not, then the US gov't may be forced to start pulling out (given that they think pulling out wouldn't serious hurt "the recovery story").

It is a very tough situation for the bear. In long term view, the market would definitely have a big correction. With the gov't's manipulation, a quick crash may not be coming though. In short term view, the market will keep going up since the "recovery story" is looking more and more real that a lot of people on the sideline are lured back into the market while selling pressure is low. Once these people are lured in, the insiders would probably start taking profits and there should be a big correction (even some bulls think the market is 30% overvalue for now). If at that point, the media can convince people to buy the dip, then we may see the market going up again.

I think there must be a certain event to create a crack to this rally. So far, no such big event occurs, a lot of bad news are hidden from regular investors. Any bad news coming out would lead to US gov't's quick reaction and investors would be sold on the talk and the hope.
 
More Comments...
 Add Comment
Comment:
Your Name:
Your Email: (Email will not be displayed anywhere)
Verification Code:

Visual CAPTCHA Regenerate Code

Enter same letters and numbers you see in above image:

 
 Author Profile
Bullet Simon Maierhofer
  ETFguide
  Co-Founder
  Simon is the Co-Founder of ETFguide.com and worked as a registered investment advisor (RIA) for 8 years. Simon holds a banking degree with honors from the prestigious German Sparkasse Bank. He grew up in Bavaria/Germany.
  http://www.etfguide.com
 Other Research from Author
How to Outsmart this M...

Bear Market Math – Are...

Could Cash on the Side...

Is The Bear Market Rea...

5 Reasons Why the Bear...

Ads
©2010 ETFGuide.com All rights reserved.
For more information regarding use of this site, please review our
Sitemap, Contact Us, Resources, Advertise with Us, Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions,Webmaster
Web designed and Powered by BimSym eBusiness Solutions, Inc.