ETF Guide
Line
# 1 FREE Exchange Traded
Funds Newsletter
Join the ETF Revolution! Keep up
With The Latest News & Trends
Line
Advanced Search
Welcome, Please Log In
 
twitter   rss  
Subscribe Bookmark and Share
Back 
It Will Be Worse Than a Double Dip
It Will Be Worse Than a Double Dip
By, Simon Maierhofer
Jun 18, 2010
A year ago, Wall Street foresaw a second Great Depression. A month ago, Wall Street saw a V-shaped recovery. Today, a double dip recovery is not out of the question. Isn’t it time to formulate an outlook that doesn’t change on a whim?
 

Are you an investor or do you simply invest? People that invest, tend to be reactive to the market’s movements, whereas, real investors are pro-active.

 

Those that invest, tend to react long after a trend is well established and shortly before it’s about to change.  Real investors listen to the market’s warning signs and take pro-active and preventative measures.

V – L – U – W Recovery

For nearly a year, Wall Street has been discussing the form and shape of the recovery.  Regardless of the recovery shape currently being favored, most are taking credit for discussing something they never saw coming.

In March 2009, when the stock market (NYSEArca: VTI) turned a corner, no one believed in a V-shaped recovery. In late 2009 and early 2010, the V-shaped recovery was a foregone conclusion. Today, the double-dip, or W-shaped recovery is gaining a bit more popularity.

 

Proponents of a V-shaped recovery (and most other scenarios) behave like fair-weather friends.  They follow the trend and have no issue abandoning the theory that seems least likely at the moment.

As discussed above, those are the traits of people who invest (or tell others how to invest). Real investors gather the facts and form an opinion that’s strong enough to withstand Wall Streets daily fluctuations. Would you listen to someone who’s recommendations change like a flag in the wind?

The ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter’s outlook remained bearish despite rising prices and optimism earlier this year. On March 2, 2009, the Newsletter predicted the onset of the biggest rally since the 2007 highs with a target of up to Dow (NYSEArca: DIA) 10,000.

The rally started just a few days later and carried farther than expected. The Dow Jones (DJI: ^DJI), S&P 500 (SNP: ^GSPC) and Nasdaq (Nasdaq: ^IXIC) rallied 75% bottom to top. In early May, eight out of ten advisors tracked by Investors Intelligence were short and/or long-term bullish. However, fundamentally, nothing had changed. The Newsletter maintained that this was a bear market rally.

There’s No Future in Backward Looking Analysis

Market forecasting is a tricky profession. Often, the market provides mixed signals; therefore, it is paramount to look at more than just one set of indicators or economic gauges.

Analysts, which seem to only look at a trend, were swayed to believe that rising stock prices, along with other lagging indicators, point towards an economic recovery. It was, however, the same trend-following approach that led them to believe that the U.S. would fall into another Great Depression early in 2009.

Connecting three rising dots, drawing a line and assuming that the forth dot is even higher, has little to do with forward-looking analysis. It’s more like driving a car by looking in the rear-view mirror.

To assume that the recession has ended simply because lagging gauges like consumer confidence, manufacturing activity, consumer spending, and earnings have recorded upticks is only a half-hearted and hap hazard attempt to predict the future.

Could it be that lagging indicators are improving because stock prices have rallied? Is it possible that consumer confidence has risen because stocks have rallied? Doesn’t a rising tide lift all boats? What if the stock market is the rising tide?

If that’s the case, one needs to discern why the stock market has rallied and whether such a rally is sustainable.

To spin this thought further, if the March 2009 – April 2010 rally is a bear market rally – which despite its intensity failed to revive the economy – the outlook is very bleak. The chances are high that a negative feedback loop between stocks and the economy will result in a worse than double dip scenario.

Aside from the fundamental flaws we’ve discussed here regularly – unemployment, artificially inflated earnings, valuations, extreme sentiment, etc. – there are other, lesser known facts that serve as a millstone around the economy’s neck.

Worse Than Double Dip

The Washington Post reported that President Obama is pleading for a $50 billion emergency aid package for state and local governments.  The package is needed to avert the layoffs of as many as 300,000 teachers, police officers and firefighters.

As Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) puts it, “there is spending fatigue. It’s tough in both houses to get votes.” States and local governments have run or are running out of money and the federal government has reached a point where it might not be able to help.

Imagine those 300,000 workers hitting the unemployment numbers along with the 100,000+ temporary census workers and all the industries affected by the BP oil spill. One June 4, unemployment data didn’t quite live up to expectations and the S&P (NYSEArca: SPY) lost over 4%, in one day.

The Associated Press reported that “Homebuilders (NYSEArca: XHB) are feeling less confident in the recovery now that government incentives for buyers have expired. Their pessimism could drag on the economy.”

ZipRealty.com quantifies the problem of the ending home buyer credit: The number of homes that closed in May is down more than 5% compared to April. Newly signed contracts in May dropped more than 10%. Internet searches on real estate sites are down 20% compared to this time in 2009.

There’s No Inflating Your Way Out of This Problem

Many still believe that the government can print its way out of the economic hole it dug by leaving too much money in the system.

Despite the government’s trillion dollar stimuli, the money supply, measured by M2 has dropped year-over-year for the first time in 15 years. The reconstituted M3 is down for the first time in 50 years.

The meaning of this is visible for anyone willing to look. Everything is getting cheaper. Flat screen TV’s, PlayStations, cell phones, cars, dining out; you name it. This is deflationary.

Once entrenched, deflation is a nasty cycle of falling demand, falling prices, rising unemployment and plummeting stock prices.

During the last quarter, the FDIC’s “Problem List” increased from 702 to 775 banks (NYSEArca: KBE). Total assets of banks (NYSEArca: IAT) teetering on default rose from $403 billion to $431 billion.

The list of problems goes on, but its core is this simple fact: The problems are always worse than initially estimated. Wall Street tends to sugar coat issues, after all Wall Street is in the business of selling stocks. Would you expect an unbiased opinion from a sales person?

In times like these, it takes an out-of-the-box analysis to stay ahead of the unfolding crisis. The ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter provides an unbiased analysis of the economy and U.S. stock market from various angles to discern its short, mid and long-term forecasts. 

 
Subscribe Bookmark and Share
 Rating
1.63 (35)
 
 Comments
Vern said on July 11, 2010
  I have been very impressed with your email articles over the last year. They seem to be no nonsense, and sometimes painfully truthful. I am really considering signing up to the newletter...can I get one free copy like Brian?

Thanks
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Carol said on July 01, 2010
  Has anyone not factored in the growth engines of the emerging markets? Growth is uneven, geographically. While it may be weak in US and EU ex France & Germany, growth is led by Asia & the other emerging mkts.

Unlike the previous depressions or recessions, this time around we may be able to avoid a double dip recession due to the strength outside US & EU. We need to be patient. The US & EU can emerge from this episode stronger, if the different political parties can work together for the good of the country instead of opposing each other for the sake of pulling each other down.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Brian said on June 23, 2010
  Maybe things have changed, but M2 at shadowstats has not gone below the 0% line. And when you read the note on the side of the chart it states: "A downward slope in this growth curve does not necessarily mean that the money supply is dropping. Only if the curve goes below zero does that show money supply having contracted over a full twelve months."

Even though there is a downward trend, it does not seem to indicate a YOY decline in M2... at least not yet.

M3- now that is a different story.

Thanks-

Brian
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
ETFguide said on June 22, 2010
  Brian - Keep in mind that the newsletter was launched on June 18. Articles were written before June 15. Perhaps the data has changed since. Nevertheless, the conclusion remains the same.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Brian said on June 22, 2010
  Thanks for the response. I checked out shadowstats.com and according to the latest chart, they are not showing M2 as dropping YOY:

http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/money-supply-charts

This chart is from June 15th so I assume it is up to date. Maybe subscribers to shadowstats.com get more reliable information?

Thanks-

Brian

 
0 like 0 dislike
 
ETFguide said on June 22, 2010
  Brian - Thank you for your kind feedback. The data on the M2 is from Shadowstats.com. We will send you a copy of the latest ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter with more specific information and charts about M2, M3 and other inflation/deflation related data.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Brian said on June 21, 2010
  Simon-

Thanks for the article. I sent it to a lot of people. I have received a few questions about the allegation that M2 has fallen YOY for the first time in 15 years. I was provided this link with data that shows otherwise:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h6/current/

Can you clarify where and how you came up with that M2 information?

Thanks again for the great article.

Keep up the good work!

Brian
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Nick said on June 21, 2010
  Confessions of a Investor (like many money managers and experts): The market can be irrational longer than you can stay solvent.

This market is going to make fools out of bulls and bears for a long time (months, years, who knows!!). So, the game is not to bet against or not bet big time or else!!

If the fundamentals are going to win over any other measures, the market should correct big time (the question is when and how deep). So, you can only benefit if you are still in the game when the day arrives(all readers of the newsletter can be loosers also if they try to go in and out of the market based on techincals).

Keep the free flow of ideas continue!!!!!!!
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
D-man said on June 21, 2010
  I agree somehow with Andy's point of view but I don't believe in the "Don't fight the FED" thing and I think they are not that stupid although I think they panic.

Now the problem is with the bond market; that is the biggest PONZI of all times imho and that market will allow the FED and the Congress to do whatever they want; it will be a long long time (if ever) before that market will say STOP; and that is precisely because that market is dominated by the same Wall Street people who are trouble because of derivatives and risky loans; they need the FED to save them, so they won't say STOP before that happening; it's happening on big scale and there is also the 30s precedent: they not what will happen if they dare to say STOP.

Regarding this statement:

"Everything is getting cheaper. Flat screen TV’s, PlayStations, cell phones, cars, dining out; you name it. This is deflationary."

I don't agree; this is just a consequence of deflation. On the other hand, not everything is getting cheaper; stocks is one thing ;)
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
barboni said on June 19, 2010
  "Isn’t it time to formulate an outlook that doesn’t change on a whim?"

I agree but how are you going to do this? Based on what? Fundamentals, technical analysis? Are you sure what is going to be the next step for the FEDs? Are you trying to tell me that no matter what decisions are going to be made the outcome is going to be the same?
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
More Comments...
 Add Comment
Comment:
Your Name:
Your Email: (Email will not be displayed anywhere)
Verification Code:
 
 Author Profile
Bullet Simon Maierhofer
  ETFguide
  Co-Founder
  Simon is the Co-Founder of ETFguide.com and worked as a registered investment advisor (RIA) for 8 years. Simon holds a banking degree with honors from the prestigious German Sparkasse Bank. He grew up in Bavaria/Germany.
  http://www.etfguide.com
 Other Research from Author
January Barometer Pred...

The Fed's Dirty Little...

Will QE3 Hopium Propel...

Has The Market's Up Si...

Better Safe than Sorry...

Ads
©2012 ETFGuide.com All rights reserved.
For more information regarding use of this site, please review our
Sitemap, Contact Us, Resources, Advertise with Us, Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions,Webmaster
Web designed and Powered by BimSym eBusiness Solutions, Inc.