ETF Guide
Line
# 1 FREE Exchange Traded
Funds Newsletter
Join the ETF Revolution! Keep up
With The Latest News & Trends
Line
Advanced Search
Welcome, Please Log In
 
twitter   rss  
Subscribe Bookmark and Share
Back 
According to Technical Indicators, Meltdown is Possible
According to Technical Indicators, Meltdown is Possible
By, Simon Maierhofer
Aug 11, 2010
The Fed openly admitted that the economic recovery is slowing down. The market agrees. With the death cross still intact, the S&P now dropped below its 200-day moving average. In context with other indicators, that's bad news.
 

Smart investors look at the risk/reward ratio before investing and periodically re-evaluate. Who wants to hitch his wagon to a losing horse?

Would you buy a stock that has a 70% probability of losing money? Would you hold a stock that has a 70% probability of losing money?

The answer is so obvious that you might assume it’s only a rhetorical question. It’s not. In fact, anyone invested in stocks (NYSEArca: VTI) right now is running a 70%+ risk of losing money over the coming weeks and months.

That’s a bold statement, so allow me to back up and explain why.

A Technically Sick Market

On July 2, 2010, the 50-day simple moving average (SMA) for the S&P (SNP: ^GSPC) crossed below the 200-day SMA for the first time since December 12, 2007. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJI: ^DJI) followed on July 6, the Nasdaq (Nasdaq: ^IXIC) on July 14, and the broadest measure of the U.S. stock market, formerly known as Wilshire 5000, on July 8.

The 200-day SMA is perceived to be the dividing line between a stock or index that is technically healthy and one that is not. When the price drops below the 200-day SMA, a red flag is raised. When the 50-day SMA drops below the 200-day SMA, a clear break of a trend is signaled.

Throughout the recent rally, the S&P's 50-day SMA remained below the 200-day SMA. Even though the S&P has spent most of the past three months trading below its 200-day SMA, the index has flirted with and stayed above the 200-day SMA since late July. Today is fell cleanly below the 200-day SMA.

A brief pop above the 200-day SMA does not invalidate the larger down trend. On July 26, the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter noted that "it is not uncommon for counter trend rallies of larger degree to persuade even technical indicators to move into bullish territory. This would most likely stir up the kind of bullish sentiment often seen at secondary tops."

A Solid Track Record

An analysis of the SMA crossover buy/sell signals triggered for the S&P over the past 10 years shows that six of the eight signals (75%) were correct. The average winning trade returned 19.72%, the average losing trade returned 6.95% (see table below). A 75% probability of success with a risk reward ratio of nearly 2.8:1 is about as good as it gets in the investing world.

                                    

If we expand the track record to include the 10/40-week SMA crossover, which was triggered as well for all the above-mentioned indexes, we get a 70% probability of success along with a risk reward ratio of 3.7:1.

If we expand the time horizon from a 10/40-week SMA to a 10/40-month SMA, we get a track record of 100% with an average return per trade of 17.68% (detailed analysis available in the August ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter).

Interestingly, the longer-term 10/40-month SMA did not trigger a buy signal in 2009, unlike the 10/40-week SMA and the 50/200-day SMA.

Lagging but Accurate

Many dismiss the 200-day or other SMAs as lagging indicators. Although an indicator may be lagging it doesn’t mean it’s incorrect or should be dismissed.

To illustrate, imagine a beautiful sunny day, with no clouds in the sky. Even though it seems impossible at the time, the weather man sees a storm coming your way. A few hours later, clouds are moving in and the breeze is picking up. Just shortly thereafter, the first raindrops are hitting the ground.

Would you go out and fire up the BBQ after the first raindrops fell? No, the raindrops only confirm the weatherman’s prediction. In fact, you might liken the raindrops to the SMA crossover. Even though a lagging indicator, the rain does confirm that a storm is coming.

A Proactive Approach

You’d expect Wall Street and the financial media to be the financial weather man and warn you of upcoming storms. Unfortunately, that is not so. Leading up to the April 2010 recovery highs, Wall Street and the media proclaimed the skies are clear, “sunny throughout the year” was their weather forecast.

Only after investors got drenched, did Wall Street recommend pulling out the umbrella. Sure enough, as soon as the umbrellas came out, stocks switched into rally mode and the sky cleared up.

Unlike Wall Street, the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter warned of the brewing storm while it was still sunny. On April 16, the newsletter warned that “historically, there has rarely been a more pronounced sell signal. The combination of sentiment extremes clearly point towards a correction. The upside potential is much more limited compared to the massive downside risk.”

Shortly thereafter, the S&P dropped over 17% from its April 26 high at 1,219 to its July 1 low at 1,011.

On July 5, with the S&P 500 futures at 1,003, the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter noted that “the S&P is butting against the 100-week SMA, lower accelerations band, 38.2% Fibonacci retracement levels, round number resistance at 1,000, and weekly s1 at 994, there is a good chance we will see some sort of a bounce develop from the 990 - 1,015 area.”

This bounce has certainly developed. In fact, the market rallied over 8%. Has this rally changed the outlook? No.

Not only do the major indexes bear the mark of the death cross, the following sectors do also: Financial sector (NYSEArca: XLF), technology sector (NYSEArca: XLK), consumer staples sector (NYSEArca: XLP), energy sector (NYSEArca: XLE), materials sector (NYSEArca: XLB), utilities sector (NYSEArca: XLU), industrials (NYSEArca: XLI) and healthcare sector (NYSEArca: XLV) all share the same fate.

The consumer discretionary sector (NYSEArca: XLY) is the only sector to escape the grip of the death cross thus far. It is somewhat surprising and unusual to see the economically sensitive consumer discretionary sector buck against a recessionary trend.

A look at Visa and Master Card provides a peek for what lies ahead, even for the discretionary sector. When consumers spend, they do so with credit cards. Visa and Master Card both got hit with a death cross. It’s just a matter of time until the discretionary sector follows.

Wait, There is More

Dr. Copper is the only metal with a PhD. This sounds corny, but as an industrial metal that’s used in everything from houses to tech gadgets, copper has an uncanny ability to foretell the future for stocks. High copper prices are reflective of high demand and a humming economy. Lower copper prices signal trouble ahead. On June 22, an ominous death cross visited copper’s chart.

Putting the Odds in Your Favor

Investing is a game of probabilities. While you always want to have the odds in your favor, you never want to bet against the odds. Right now, the odds are piling up on the bearish side of the ledger. Even though Wall Street is saying that the sky has cleared up, “meteorologists” with a better track record are warning of the storm ahead.

In fact, there is one rare chart formation that strongly suggests the onset of a 2008-like decline, a development that’s certainly supported by the number of death crosses spanning a variety of markets.

The August issue of the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter includes a detailed short, mid and long-term forecast, along with the one chart that tells the market’s story and true bearish potential. 

 
Subscribe Bookmark and Share
 Rating
2.03 (29)
 
 Comments
Simon Maierhofer said on August 16, 2010
  TO - Below is the formula used to calculate pivots. High, low and closing prices are used. When using them as support/resistance areas, they tend to apply intraday. Keep in mind that many of the pivots are weekly or monthly. As such you may see an index move through the support/resistance on daily closing prices but end up at or below at end of week/month basis.

The numbers for support and resistance that are calculated indicate the potential ranges for the next time frame based on the past weight of the market’s strength or weakness. This is derived from the calculations of the high, low and distance from the close of those points. Pivot point analysis is also used for identifying breakout points from the support and resistance numbers. The previous sessions trading range could be based and calculated for an hour, a day, a week or a month.
PP = (H + L + C)/3
The first resistance level (R1)=(PPx2)-L
The second resistance level (R2)=PP+H-L
The fist support level (s1)=(PPx2)-H
The second support level (S2)=PP-H+L
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
TO said on August 16, 2010
  Simon, is the weekly and daily S1-S2 and R1-R2 referenced in the TF based on closing or intra day levels? For example this morning the S&P traded at 1069-1070. Thanks!
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Simon Maierhofer said on August 12, 2010
  ETFstrategyLove - There are a number of factors to consider:
1) TZA is linked to small caps, FAZ is linked to financial stocks. We expect both - small caps and financial - to lead the next leg down. Which of the two will fall harder and faster? We don't know. If it was me, I would hold both (or more) sectors.
2) Tracking error. Leveraged ETFs, in particular 3x leveraged ones do have significant tracking error. Please take some time to review the April 2009 newsletter which discusses the flaws of leveraged ETFs. It is very important that you understand the nature of leveraged ETFs before investing.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
ETFstrategyLove said on August 11, 2010
  Hey Simon,
In the long run, which one do you think is better ETF pick in terms of profit, TZA or FAZ ?
because when I looked back in March 2009 the highest price for TZA was 529.75 and FAZ was 1040.70. I don't know if it is because of stock split but it seems like FAZ is better choice. However, today FAZ went up 10.06% and TZA went up 11.47%. I am a novice investor and need some explanation on this and please let me know which one would be more profitable in the long run. Thank You!
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Simon Maierhofer said on August 11, 2010
  Hi All - Thank you for your positive feedback and insightful comments. traderjoe2010, you are right, some have used the recent rally in Dr. Copper (glad you liked that) as reason for higher stock prices. However, the larger trend for copper has been down.
Groodle - you are absolutely right, it's supposed to be years.
WallStreetUrinal - It seems like you appreciate CNBC as much as we.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
traderjoe2010 said on August 11, 2010
  Simon,

All around solid analysis, even though most bulls will pick it apart to replace your sentences, paragraphs and charts with their own nonsense.

Lastly, I'm not much of a metals trader, but I also enjoyed the "Dr. Copper" mention. I never knew he/she was a doctor. Funny!
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Groodle said on August 11, 2010
  "An analysis of the SMA crossover buy/sell signals triggered for the S&P over the past 10 days shows that six of the eight signals (75%) were correct. "

I think you meant over the last 10 years.

Good article. I'm glad you guys write these daily. They're very informative.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
WallStreetUrinal said on August 11, 2010
  This market isn't just technically sick it's fundamentally sick. But according to CNBC and the Big Wigs "the worst is over." Buy stocks, buy bonds, buy real estate, buy mutual funds, buy hedge funds, buy derivatives, buy whatever Wall Street is selling. Buy, buy, buy, buy, buy.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Jason Bressler said on August 11, 2010
  Hi,

I wanted to let you know that the index you refer to as "formlerly known as the Wilshire 5000" is still known as the Wilshire 5000 and can be tracked on by following the ticker W5000.

Thanks,
Jason
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
JASON said on August 11, 2010
  Hi tonk, consumers will be in better shape for saving some of their money instead of spending it. The idea that people need to shop until their wallets drop is flawed. Something like 75% of the U.S. economy comes from consumers, but this figure still needs to go down. Society cannot continue historical consumption rates with as much debt and unemployment as we currently have.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
More Comments...
 Add Comment
Comment:
Your Name:
Your Email: (Email will not be displayed anywhere)
Verification Code:
 
 Author Profile
Bullet Simon Maierhofer
  ETFguide
  Co-Founder
  Simon is the Co-Founder of ETFguide.com and worked as a registered investment advisor (RIA) for 8 years. Simon holds a banking degree with honors from the prestigious German Sparkasse Bank. He grew up in Bavaria/Germany.
  http://www.etfguide.com
 Other Research from Author
January Up – Now There...

The Fed's Dirty Little...

Will QE3 Hopium Propel...

Has The Market's Up Si...

Gutsy Call - A Top See...

Ads
©2012 ETFGuide.com All rights reserved.
For more information regarding use of this site, please review our
Sitemap, Contact Us, Resources, Advertise with Us, Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions,Webmaster
Web designed and Powered by BimSym eBusiness Solutions, Inc.