ETF Guide
Line
# 1 FREE Exchange Traded
Funds Newsletter
Join the ETF Revolution! Keep up
With The Latest News & Trends
Line
Advanced Search
Welcome, Please Log In
 
twitter   rss  
Subscribe Bookmark and Share
Back 
New Home Sales:  No Real Rebound
New Home Sales: No Real Rebound
By, DARYL MONTGOMERY
Jul 26, 2010
The Commerce Department released June new home sales today and claimed they were up 24%. This is only the case if you take into account the May figure being revised downward to 267,000. The previous number reported for May was 300,000, which was an all-time low. No matter how you look at it, new home sales are at a depression level.
 

The June New Homes Sales figures were released today and the Commerce Department claimed they were up almost 24%. Stocks rallied strongly on the supposedly good news. A revision of May's all-time low number to a much worse all-time low number is what gave the appearance of a strong rebound.


New home sales for May were originally reported at a 300,000 annual rate last month. This compares to a high of around 1.4 million in 2005. It was also the lowest number ever recorded in the history of the data. As bad as 300,000 was, and it was truly awful, there was a significant downward revision for May sales in the current report to only 267,000.
 
May sales were also not the only month with a downward revision. The figures for April were originally reported as 504,000 in the report released in May. Then in the report released in June, they were revised lower to 446,000. Then in today's July report they were revised downward again to 422,000. Do we see a trend here?
 
The home buyer tax credit was good until the end of April. With the revised numbers, new home sales actually fell 37% in May, not the merely disastrous 33% originally reported. The drop from the originally reported April number was 47% however. If you wish to claim there was a 24% rebound for the numbers in June, as the government did, you need to put it in the context of a 47% drop first taking place, otherwise you are comparing apples to oranges. No matter how you look at it though, new home sales were and still are at depression levels.  

New home sales figures have been continually revised downward for several months now. It is highly likely that the 330,000 number just reported for June will be revised lower next month and quite possibly lower again the month after that. The Commerce Department reports the best number possible the month of the release. The mainstream media then gives that news big attention and uses it to reinforce an image that government programs are being effective. When the downward revisions take place in future months and indicate things aren't quite so rosy, that news gets buried in the article - if it is mentioned at all. This is not the only U.S. government data where this pattern exists, nor does this only take place in this country. Investors shouldn't let themselves be tricked by this game.

Disclosure: No positions.
 
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21 

 
Subscribe Bookmark and Share
 Rating
1.88 (34)
 
 Comments
ETFguide said on July 29, 2010
  marketstudent - Good question. It is certainly good for the economy to have good "initial" numbers. Who cares if they are revised later on. Eventually this will change.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
ETFguide said on July 27, 2010
  Steppenwulf - Cash is a good place to be right now. Going long sounds like simple advice. But what happens when the market drops 1 or 2%. Will you stay long or go short or turn neutral. There is a real risk of getting seesawed, a risk that is not fully explained in your opinion.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Steppenwulf said on July 27, 2010
  I'm not trying to be a nay-sayer, here, but isn't it about time to think that maybe this is a serious rally? It may be a bear market rally, but a bear market rally is still a rally, right?

I'm thinking that it just doesn't pay to fight the trend. The way the indices are blowing through resistance, it is clear that, at least in the short term we are headed up.

It doesn't mean that I don't buy the general thesis that the economy is in a tough place, and that prices will come down later - but later could be after another 10-20% up, in Sept or Oct... Who wants to lose money being short, waiting for it?

@marketstudent - this is just my view, but I think it is not that easy to get the real number. I was listening on NPR to an interview of the economists who try to calculate them, and they basically said it takes about 2 years to get real confidence in a number - because a lot of information either isn't collected, or is considered a trade secret and isn't published, so they have to guess and wait to see if 2ndary calculations support their initial guesses. I'm not saying it can't be manipulated, but just that even if it isn't manipulated, it is not so easy to get simple black and white statistics on everything...
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
ETFguide Team said on July 26, 2010
  John - The topic of market manipulation has been discussed by ETFguide both on this site and via the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter. You may use the above search feature (top right corner) to search for related articles. Enter "PPT" or "Plunge Protection Team."
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
John said on July 26, 2010
  Revising numbers down is not rocket science, even I understand it without having to crack a book. Surely the market undertstands this as well, yet rally it does...surely the market understands that housing sales stink, yet triple digit gains almost everyday??

So the question is, why does the market rally when a smart 4th grader can understand the numbers game? Is there some market manipulation or are there real good things happening behind the scenes that only insiders know about? Isn't it time for etfguide to address the topic of market manipulation again as the market things itself a bull?

What am I missing here???
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
marketstudent said on July 26, 2010
  Very interesting article. What is the purpose of releasing a number and then having to revise it? Why not just release the correct information in the first place? Is this all a part of the "game" or is there another reason?

Thanks again for your great articles. I am also a subscriber.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
More Comments...
 Add Comment
Comment:
Your Name:
Your Email: (Email will not be displayed anywhere)
Verification Code:
 
 Author Profile
Bullet DARYL MONTGOMERY
  New York Investing meetup
  Organizer
  Mr. Montgomery is Author of Inflation Investing – A Guide for the 2010s. He's an independent market strategist and trader along with organizer of the New York Investing meetup.
  http://investing.meetup.com/21
 Other Research from Author
Why the EU Debt Crisis...

Retail Sales and Emplo...

The Art of Statistical...

Why Deflation Creates ...

Crises in Europe, Chin...

Ads
©2012 ETFGuide.com All rights reserved.
For more information regarding use of this site, please review our
Sitemap, Contact Us, Resources, Advertise with Us, Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions,Webmaster
Web designed and Powered by BimSym eBusiness Solutions, Inc.