ETF Guide
Line
# 1 FREE Exchange Traded
Funds Newsletter
Join the ETF Revolution! Keep up
With The Latest News & Trends
Line
Advanced Search
Welcome, Please Log In
 
twitter   rss  
Subscribe Bookmark and Share
Back 
Bear Market Math - Are the July Lows in Danger?
Bear Market Math - Are the July Lows in Danger?
By, Simon Maierhofer
Aug 20, 2010
The S&P 500 has dropped 5% in a few days. The reversal from up to down occurred at a point that hosted well known resistance levels. Technically speaking, this is bearish. How about other facts? Are the July lows in danger? Here’s a common sense, simple math approach to the subject.
 

1+1=2
2+2=4

The simplicity and accuracy of those calculations is undeniable. How about this equation?

Fundamental Weakness + Technical Sell Signals + Overpriced Stocks = Lower Stock Prices. This calculation also seems to be simple and accurate. Let’s look at some equations that don’t make sense.

1+1=3 or Better Earnings = Higher Stock Prices

Earnings season is over. Most companies beat earnings but issued cautious forecasts. This is particularly true of the tech (NYSEArca: XLK) and financial sectors (NYSEArca: XLF).  By large, profits are still driven by cost-cutting, not organic growth.

Retail sales, which make up about one third of the economy, continued to fall after the second quarter ended. Additionally, the expectation that taxes will go up might have moved some companies to pull some of next year’s income into this year. This can’t be good for Q3 and Q4 profits.

As the chart below shows, positive earnings reports are not bullish for stocks (NYSEArca: VTI), especially if future guidance is weak.

2+2=5 or Weaker than Expected Economy = Rising Stock Prices

On July 30, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) lowered the Q2 Gross Domestic Product (GD) growth from an estimated 2.7% to 2.4%. On August 27, the Q2 GDP was lowered further to a jaw-dropping 1.6%. But it didn’t stop there. The real GDP for all three previous years was revised as well. It was lowered by 0.2% for 2007, it was lowered by 0.6% for 2008, and it was lowered by 0.4% for 2009.

In percentage terms, the real GDP for 2007 was revised down from 2.5% growth to 2.3%. The 2008 decrease was lowered from 1.9% to 2.8% and 2009 growth was revised up from a 0.1% to a 0.2% increase. In essence, the BEA proved that the recession was (or is) much deeper than perceived and the alleged recovery much weaker than previously reported.

This comes as no surprise, as the key sector of the financial debacle – real estate (NYSEArca: IYR) – remains in a funk.

The U.S. Census Bureau reported that the number of vacant properties, including foreclosures, residences for sale, and vacation homes, reached 18.9 million. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac continue to lose money.

Has anyone ever wondered how banks (NYSEArca: KBE) can make money on the same kind of loans that pushed Fannie and Freddie to the brink of ruin? Since bad real estate loans triggered the post 2007 economic meltdown, how can the economy recover without real estate leading the way?

3+3=7 or Positive Analyst Estimates = Higher Stock Prices

A recent Associated Press article observed that “analysts only seem to hit the mark with their estimates in the strongest economic times (2003 – 2006).” Why? “The problem is that analysts get most of their information from the companies they cover. Corporate managers have every incentive to stay positive for as long as they can.”

Is that true; as true as 1+1=2? On April 26, the day the S&P (SNP: ^GSPC) topped at 1,219, the Dow (DJI: ^DJI) at 11,258, the Nasdaq (Nasdaq: ^IXIC) at 2,535, Bloomberg reported the following: “U.S. stocks cheapest since 1990 on analyst estimates.”

Contrary to analyst estimates, the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter stated that “the potential exists that Monday’s high marked a significant top.” Since April, the broad market (NYSEArca: TWM) dropped as much as 17%.

In March 2009, with the Dow below 7000 and the S&P below 700, analysts lowered their earnings forecasts from $113 in April 2008 to $40. On March 2nd, the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter sent out a Trend Change Alert and recommended to buy long and leveraged long ETFs such as the Ultra Financial (NYSEArca: UYG) and Ultra S&P 500 ProShares (NYSEArca: SSO).

If you care to know, until recently, analysts estimated that earnings for the S&P 500 will exceed their 2006 all-time high, in 2011. Based on that assumption, stocks are cheap. How about that for flawed math?

4+4=9 or Technical Sell Signals = Higher Stock Prices

The 200-day moving average (MA) is one of the best-known technical indicators, as it provides delineation between technically healthy and sick stocks.

On May 20, the S&P closed below the 200-day MA for the first time since late 2007. Every attempt to rally and stay above it has since failed miserably. On July 2, the 50-day MA for the S&P dropped below its 200-day MA for the first time since late 2007. The same holds true for mid caps (NYSEArca: MDY), small caps (NYSEArca: IWM) and nearly all individual sector indexes. For good reason, this is called a Death Cross.

Over the past ten years, the death cross has been accurate 75% of the time, with a 19.72% average return on six winning trades and 6.95% average return on two losing trades.

In addition to the Death Cross, there are two head and shoulders patterns, one in the making for over 10 years, and the other has the breadth suggestive of a major meltdown (see September ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter).

5+5=11 or Overvalued Stocks = Higher Prices

As explained above, based on overly optimistic earnings estimates, analysts believe that stocks are cheap. Rather than basing a future outlook on estimates, it makes sense to use facts as a foundation for any outlook. Why add an extra variable to what’s already an unpredictable market?

Ask Yale Professor Robert Shiller, who’s done extensive research on the subject of valuations, and he’ll tell you stocks are historically overvalued based on the current P/E ratio. Compare today’s P/E ratio with the P/E ratio seen at major market bottoms, and you’ll see that stocks are overvalued by more than 50%.

Another gauge that doesn’t lie is dividend yields. A company’s dividends are a direct reflection of cash flow and financial health.

The current yield is 2.65% for the Dow and 2.05% for the S&P.  Even value funds like the iShares Russell 1000 Value (NYSEArca: IWD) yield only a measly 2.08%. Dividends are close to their all-time low set in 1999 (we know what happened then). This means that companies are cash strapped or overvalued.

Looking at a long-term chart of dividend yields plotted against stock prices shows clearly that markets don’t bottom until dividends skyrocket. Just as ice doesn’t thaw unless the temperature moves above 32 degrees, the economy won’t thaw and show signs of life unless P/E ratios drop to, and dividend yields rise to, levels seen at major market bottoms.

The ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter includes a detailed analysis of four valuation metrics, along with short-term target ranges for stocks and the ultimate market bottom.

Based on simple math and common sense, the July lows are certainly in danger. But it doesn’t stop there.

 
Subscribe Bookmark and Share
 Rating
2.44 (32)
 
 Comments
Bob said on December 16, 2010
  Hello Simon, could you answer this question please. Since March of 2009, what "right calls" have you made. Could you itemize those next to your mistakes?
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Simon Maierhofer said on August 31, 2010
  whynotu2 - It's nothing new, but the key to a sustained recovery are jobs and real estate prices. Real estate was the root of the post-2007 meltdown. Without a REAL recovery in real estate prices, there won't be a REAL economic recovery. Jobs are equally important. With a REAL unemployment rate close to (or even above) 20%, the economy can't grow.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
whynotu2 said on August 27, 2010
  @ Simon, I understand and agree with you that growth is anemic. It is just amazing how much we have spent as a Country (without being asked by the way0 to get to this place and how much more Ben is willing to spend to keep up this house of cards. I was just curious though what indicators could point to increased spending by business that would clearly signal a turn-around in jobs and ultimately the economy? It is clear that nothing the government is doing right now is encouraging any real growth due to the uncertainty. This has kept all of our eyes on the eventual downside. BUT what would be catalyst to the opposite side to justify substantially higher prices from here? Would it be possible to paint for us with your views what you would see as being positive developments? What are the things no one is looking for or at that would change the current negative outlook? Thanks & great realistic views!

@ Alangreenscam - I don't trust any of the government stats and apparently no one even cares about them. Take for instance today's (8/27) market action. On a double dose of negative news (Intel preannouncing a revenue miss and a revision downward in Q2GDP), the market has its best up day in weeks. What I stipulated to Simon also applies to your commentary. What would it be in the GDP figures or other government stats that would signal that a major turn upward in economic activity were about to occur? Or have we traveled so far down the path of economic destruction that the only way from here is a painful (and hopefully short as Simon has said before) depression. Thanks for your views Alangreenscam (nice, appropriate name for him too).
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Simon Maierhofer said on August 27, 2010
  whynotu2 - It is hard to base any decision on GDP. A couple of months ago, GDP growth was announced to have been 2.7%. On July 30 it was revised to 2.4%, today it was revised to 1.6%. Bottom line, growth is anemic.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
AlanGreenscam said on August 27, 2010
  Question for whynotu2: Which GDP numbers do you believe? The originally reported ones or the re-revised reported ones or the re-re-re-revised reported ones? If you're confused, so are we.

REAL FACT: GDP numbers are gamed government statistics, designed to give a rigged viewpoint of the world.

I think any serious economist, analyst or whoever that still uses GDP in their financial projections is misleading themselves.

Here's a good link about how 2Q GDP is gamed. Also, see J.Williams ShadowStats for the real numbers, as he says "minus the political hype."

http://www.etfguide.com/research/399/23/Q2-GDP-Report:-The-5-Most-Important-Items/
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
whynotu2 said on August 27, 2010
  Would today's revision in GDP (released on 8/27) indicating businesses have been splurging on equipment and software, which also contributed to the surge in imports lead to more hiring down the road? Business investment was revised up to a 17.6 percent rate, the largest increase since the first quarter of 2006, from the previously estimated 17 percent pace. It would seem that either there are bargins that companies are capitalizing on or they are gearing up to hire more employees to use all that new stuff. What is your take Mr. Maierofer? Thanks.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
TO said on August 25, 2010
  Thanks. I decided to cover this morning with the S&P trading at 1042. Would rather protect profits and stand aside for any possible bounce.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
ETFguide said on August 25, 2010
  Jake - You are correct, it's market bottoms. Thanks for pointing this out.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
Jake said on August 25, 2010
 
When you say "the economy won’t thaw and show signs of life unless P/E ratios drop to, and dividend yields rise to, levels seen at major market tops." Shouldnt this be "major market bottoms"?
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
ETFguide said on August 25, 2010
  TO: More information will be provided in tonights Technical Forecast. Aside from short-term bounces, the overall trend still remains down.
 
0 like 0 dislike
 
More Comments...
 Add Comment
Comment:
Your Name:
Your Email: (Email will not be displayed anywhere)
Verification Code:
 
 Author Profile
Bullet Simon Maierhofer
  ETFguide
  Co-Founder
  Simon is the Co-Founder of ETFguide.com and worked as a registered investment advisor (RIA) for 8 years. Simon holds a banking degree with honors from the prestigious German Sparkasse Bank. He grew up in Bavaria/Germany.
  http://www.etfguide.com
 Other Research from Author
January Barometer Pred...

The Fed's Dirty Little...

Will QE3 Hopium Propel...

Has The Market's Up Si...

Better Safe than Sorry...

Ads
©2012 ETFGuide.com All rights reserved.
For more information regarding use of this site, please review our
Sitemap, Contact Us, Resources, Advertise with Us, Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions,Webmaster
Web designed and Powered by BimSym eBusiness Solutions, Inc.