MyRA is Dead on Arrival

MyRA is Dead on Arrival

During his State of the Union address, President Obama unveiled his new plan to increase retirement savings. The plan is dubbed “MyRA” and is geared for people without a company sponsored retirement plan.

Sadly, MyRA is more than a futile attempt at preventing people from retiring without money. It’s another shining example of grandstanding and brow beating of the American public by out-of-touch bureaucrats, telling people to save more money for retirement or else.

Problem #1
American’s household income has been stagnant over the past 19 years. Today, the average household makes exactly what it made in 1995; $51,000. (See chart below) People cannot accumulate adequate financial savings if their earnings power isn’t growing.

WATCH: Beware of “Smart Beta” Investing

Problem #2
MyRA is zero benefit to the 20.6 million people without a job. Furthermore, the labor force participation rate near 62.8% is at its lowest level in 35 years.

It’s an insult to be preaching to the public they need to save more money, when too many Americans still lack a good and productive job.

Median US Household Income

Problem #3
Retirement savings from MyRA is supposed to be funneled into U.S. Treasuries. A better investment alternative, albeit an imperfect solution, would’ve been to offer a 50/50 even split between stocks (NYSEARCA:SCHB) and bonds (NYSEARCA:BND). At the very least, investment risk could be evenly divided.

In this case, the exclusive option of Treasury or U.S savings bonds (NYSEARCA:TLT) in MyRA accounts smells like a self-serving plan intended to help the U.S. government finance its reckless spending via gullible and unsuspecting citizens. Guess who gets slaughtered when the Treasury market eventually implodes because of government overspending?

Problem #4
MyRA’s idea of being a flexible plan that allows people to save as little as $5 is a total joke. Are the financial planners in the White House serious? People aren’t going to achieve a comfortable retirement income saving $5 per month in a U.S. government bond earning a 1% interest rate.

MyRA is a backwards plan because it doesn’t tackle the problem behind a lack of retirement savings in the right order. It proposes a poorly designed plan to get people to save money for retirement, when many of the people the MyRA plan targets don’t have adequate wages or job stability in the first place.

Wealth at retirement doesn’t happen by accident. It comes from uninterrupted work and steady wage growth. In turn, both of these things encourage higher retirement savings.

From traditional IRAs to ROTH IRAs and 401(k) plans, there’s no shortage of retirement savings vehicles with better investment choices than MyRA. Retirement savers who want to invest in Treasury bonds don’t need a MyRA plan. They can invest that way elsewhere, even if their employer doesn’t offer a workplace retirement plan.

The American worker isn’t going to achieve retirement security from a silly and shallow financial scheme like MyRA.

Besides having a really awkward and confusing name, MyRA pretends to fill a missing gap that simply doesn’t exist. It’s a poorly designed idea by desperate central planners trying to be heroes. Or, as they say in the medical field: “Dead on arrival.”

The ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter uses technical, fundamental, and sentiment analysis along with market history and common sense to keep investors on the right side of the market.  In 2013, 70% of our weekly ETF picks were winners.

Follow us on Twittter @ ETFguide

Suggested Reads:

4 comments on “MyRA is Dead on Arrival
  1. Carmichael says:

    This is the government’s way of trying to accomodate the Treasury market because of the big Fed QE scale back. If we can’t get the Chinese or the Fed to buy more US bonds, then let’s get the American public to do it!

  2. ZehtaL says:

    MyRA = Let me steal from you.

  3. Perk-u-lator says:

    If the MyRA is such a good idea, how come nobody in Congress and the President himself will put their own money into it? Shouldn’t they lead by example, no? What are they waiting for?

  4. Chris Michaud says:

    This is such a bogus plan. This is the initial salvo of getting the government to get its hands on ALL retirement funds. Why? There is about $21 TRILLION in all pensions plans in cash. The deficit by the time Obama leaves office (hopefully) will be about $20 Trillion. This 1st “salvo” is to “protect” and “prove” the efficiency and “safety that ordinary Americans can enjoy with a GUARANTEED return in a SAFE investment backed by the full faith and credit of the US government” (hahaha). After a few years of it working “so well” there will be a push to “guarantee ALL pensions, with the US government as TRUSTEE.” Then through the same theft and sleight of hand that they usually do things, these “pension funds” will be “invested in the American people through TREASURY BONDS” (hahahahha), which will of course be paid “upon demand in retirement,” subject of course to “appropriate taxes,” which would increase drastically if you took out too much that could “destabilize the system.” It’s a mere accounting trick to “balance the books.” $20 trillion deficit, wiped out by $20 trillion in “NEW assets.” Interestingly of course, you won’t find congressional or government workers (union democrat voters) retirement funds into the pool because “THEY are already PROTECTED by the full faith and credit of the US government.” These guys are so cheesy and transparent, the odd thing is that since there are no more REPORTERS who actually can figure this stuff out for themselves, they actually become apologist advocates of this kind of grand larceny.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


One FREE Month of ETF Premium

Click the report icon to sign up and receive one FREE month of ETF Premium Membership.

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons

Get One FREE Month of ETF Premium

Simply provide your email address and we'll give you One FREE Month of ETF Premium!