Valuation Models Say Stock Market Losses Ahead

Overpaying for anything is a bad idea. But it’s an especially bad thing when it comes to investing in the stock market.

James Montier at GMO correctly observes:

“Over the years I’ve witnessed many attempts by the practitioners of this most dark art to justify why tried and tested measures of valuation are no longer meaningful, or occasionally create new measures of valuation that purport to show the market to be cheap.”

For whatever it’s worth, Montier’s latest paper examines five valuation models for estimating the performance of U.S. stocks (NYSEARCA:VTI) over the next seven years. On the optimistic side, they include the cheery NIPA CAPE, which projects an expected real return of 3.6% compared to the more sober Shiller full mean reversion model which projects a -3.2% loss.

The average blended return of all five models is zero and if the spurious NIPA-based CAPE is excluded, the average seven year return falls to almost -1%.

GMO Expectations

Even if equity valuations (NasdaqGM:QQQ) are overstretched by historical standards – and we know they are –  there’s no light bulb in the stock market’s brain that suddenly triggers a major selloff because stocks are expensive.

As we’ve pointed out before, stocks do not necessarily need to be grossly overvalued before suffering a sharp setback. Have we already forgotten what happened in 2007?

AUDIO: Emerging Markets are Burning! Here’s how to Capitalize

In Oct. 2007, the S&P 500’s (SNP:^GSPC) P/E ratio was just 19.42 compared to a frothy 29.41 in March 2000. By historical standards, the U.S. stock market (NYSEARCA:IVV) in the fall of 2007 was a screaming bargain compared to the stock market of 2000. But that still didn’t stop stocks from declining almost 50% over the following 18 months.

Past and Present S&P 500 Valuations

Looking back, investors that used historically cheap P/E ratios in 2007 as a reason to buy stocks (NYSEARCA:IWM) were badly misguided. Will the future be any different for people who use the same rationale as their guide?

Stock market valuations do matter, but emotion and psychology plays key roles in moving and shaping stock prices. This will always be the case so long as the stock market has greedy and fearful human participants.  That’s also why a vigilant monitoring  of the stock market’s mood or sentiment is a must.

The ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter uses technical, fundamental, and sentiment analysis along with market history and common sense to keep investors on the right side of the market.  In 2013, 70% of our weekly ETF picks were gainers.

Follow us on Twittter @ ETFguide

Suggested Reads:

3 comments on “Valuation Models Say Stock Market Losses Ahead
  1. grant8 says:

    For the board: Jeremy Siegel promotes the NIPA CAPE metric and it’s not surprising to see why it’s the most bullish reading among the 5 models.

  2. Doenja Clerkx says:

    The Shiller PE (Cyclically Adjusted PE Ratio (CAPE Ratio)) says stocks aren’t cheap at all with a current value of 25.52, well above the 16.52 mean:

    Their table gives the following values for the dates on your chart:
    Jan 1, 1997 28.33
    Apr 1, 2000 43.53 (yikes!)
    Oct 1, 2002 21.95
    Oct 1, 2007 27.31
    Apr 1, 2009 14.98
    Oct 1, 2013 23.83
    Feb 26, 2014 25.52

    It seems to make more sense at the lows of S&P 500, the difference with the PE ratio at april 1st 2009 is huge.

    Of course it’s just one way of valuation, I prefer to use several, including Tobin’s Q:
    (doesn’t look cheap to me)

    I also like the fear and greed index, as a nice contra indicator:

    And of course all your analysis!! Thank you for that!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


One FREE Month of ETF Premium

Click the report icon to sign up and receive one FREE month of ETF Premium Membership.

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons

Get One FREE Month of ETF Premium

Simply provide your email address and we'll give you One FREE Month of ETF Premium!